Quote:
| Originally Posted by DT She used an argument that we've had little luck finding mafia day 1 to justify voting abstain. I responded to the logic of the argument, because I know that she knows the town actively voting to abstain wouldn't help anything, and that she knows that most of the town know the same thing. Why did you say she never implied she wanted to abstain, though, her response to my post? I don't believe it's what she actually wants, but she has implied it on occasion. |
Mostly because of the last part of her response post. I understand what you read in the post, but what hit me most was the last part of the post about her 'voting the way she does', and I thought that made it pretty clear (to me at the very least) that she's not voting abstain because she really wants the town to abstain. I thought she maybe didn't want to lynch (or at least not irrationally) on day 1, but I never got the impression she actually wanted to abstain-- but now that I reread this, I understand where you may have gotten that impression, and I'll stop bugging you about it. x{D
--
clarification:
I got the impression that maybe she didn't want a lynch on day 1, or maybe just not one without anything to back it up, but I never got the feeling that she wanted the town to vote abstain and end the day EARLY, as I feel you thought she wanted.
I think we just read her post in two different ways, is all.