View Single Post
Old 11-09-2009, 06:52 PM   #10
Random User
Senior Member
 
Random User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Floating aimlessly somewhere.
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,941
Thanks: 284
Thanked 118 Times in 95 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Seraphim View Post
On of the biggest problems is Square and Nintendo have not had the best relatonship since back during the SNES days, and everyone knows there was a argument between the two companies with SMRPG was released, because Nintendo said Square did a horrible job and that Mario was not what they had planned on, and it didn't feel like a Mario game.
When I played it it felt just like a Mario game, just with turn-based rpg battles put in. What has Mario done in every game before? Jump. Mario jumps in an overworld filled with platforming and you have a Mario game. I just cant believe how stupid Nintendo can act sometimes...

And a question: Is Geno and others that debuted in SMRPG belong to Square, Nintendo, or both?

Also the chances really suck for SMRPG having a sequel any time soon... Considering Square didn't even let them use the foest maze song in Brawl. But to make a sequel would definatly be a massive success, and it would be a smart financial plan, so it doesn't seem completely unlikely that there will never be a sequel.
Random User is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04219 seconds with 11 queries