View Single Post
Old 11-11-2009, 06:53 PM   #5
Lurch1982
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: DenCo
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,850
Thanks: 127
Thanked 365 Times in 192 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booyakasha View Post
I really hope 'Fable III' doesn't require Natal. That would suck.
Hopefully Molyneaux will spend six months telling me how its required and how awesome Natal is. So when Fable III does roll out it won't need it at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I REALLY HATE POKEMON! View Post
If they just start cramming Natal into bundles with something good to go with it, I think nit will have a better chance.

I hate the name Natal though. I think they were going for the weird "Wii" type name for it.
As of right now, I haven't seen anything to convince me to buy it. Keeping it under $100 is a good idea. Keeping it under $100 and packing it with a game I'd buy anyway is better. Doubt it will happen, and I haven't seen anything confirmed that would make me believe it won't go the way of the Playstation Eye attachment.

Last edited by Lurch1982; 11-11-2009 at 06:53 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Lurch1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lurch1982 For This Useful Post:
Booyakasha (11-11-2009), I REALLY HATE POKEMON! (11-11-2009), Valigarmander (11-11-2009)
 
Page generated in 0.03780 seconds with 11 queries