Video Game Forums - View Single Post - Who was the REAL villian of Final Fantasy X?

Dark Seraphim · 01-20-2010, 02:15 PM

I guess in general that's my biggest complaint about Final Fantasy X, the anti-climatic ending of it. I mean the whole Spoiler Below

sad ending because instead of Yuna dying Tidus sort of ceases to exist and all that bittersweetness

, but the whole final boss thing was just too easy. It was too long to be a scripted battle, having to find all your Aeons and then a phony final boss while you cannot die? And was too easy to be a final boss, I mean even Necron, who was sort of a sucky final boss as he had really nothing to do with the story, at least was a challenge. Seems in Final Fantasy IX they have us too much challenge without any substance, we got a difficult final boss but we didn't know why, and then in Final Fantasy X they pull a 180 and we get a boss that has a lot of backstory and substance, but no challenge. Way to totally miss the middle ground 2 times in a row Squaresoft!

01-20-2010, 02:15 PM	#22
Dark Seraphim Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Gender: Posts: 431 Thanks: 4 Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts	I guess in general that's my biggest complaint about Final Fantasy X, the anti-climatic ending of it. I mean the whole Spoiler Below sad ending because instead of Yuna dying Tidus sort of ceases to exist and all that bittersweetness , but the whole final boss thing was just too easy. It was too long to be a scripted battle, having to find all your Aeons and then a phony final boss while you cannot die? And was too easy to be a final boss, I mean even Necron, who was sort of a sucky final boss as he had really nothing to do with the story, at least was a challenge. Seems in Final Fantasy IX they have us too much challenge without any substance, we got a difficult final boss but we didn't know why, and then in Final Fantasy X they pull a 180 and we get a boss that has a lot of backstory and substance, but no challenge. Way to totally miss the middle ground 2 times in a row Squaresoft!