Knights didn't parry with their swords; they were trained either to duck a blow or parry it with their shields. The shield was mounted on the forearm and elbow, a body structure with considerable power; whereas the sword is supported by the wrist, which is comparatively weak.
The knight would hardcore win. Yes, his armour is heavier, but knights' training was designed to promote and improve strength. (I mean, knights had to stay agile; they had to be able to run up siege ladders and such.) Also, the samurai sword is lighter, as it was designed primarily for cutting, and the design of samurai armour (iron and bamboo strips) reflects this; whereas the knight's sword is heavier, and was designed for chopping. The edge might not penetrate armour, but the sheer weight of the weapon, combined with the power of the attack, was enough to maim and crush bones.
I figure, the samurai would get in a stroke or two, but as soon as the knight got in a solid hit, it'd be all over. |