View Single Post
Old 04-17-2005, 09:14 AM   #21
The Missing Link
Professional Lurker
 
The Missing Link's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New Hyrule, Washington, US
Gender: Male
Posts: 15,753
Thanks: 99
Thanked 317 Times in 215 Posts
Points: 16,119.15
Bank: 115,121.47
Total Points: 131,240.62
   
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Phil the Alchemist:

Though, when speaking about amino acids forming under the Earth's conditions, it is impossible for amino acids to form spontaneously with the presence of oxygen.
Let me pose a condundrum to ya. A riddle if ya will.

You make the assumption that, for all 4.5B years of Earth that we can know that oxygen was a key factor in our atmosphere. (I doubt this can be proven yet for all 4.5B years considering we're only just now able to dig into the mantle and I reckon that a good bit of time has worn off and liquified therein, but I'll at least assume for a long time then.) What if the composition of the atmospheric layers OR the ocean was not the way it is today? I'm not talking about the fusion of oxygen, although I can talk about the creation of oxygen from photosynthesis of plants. Provided such a thing occurred long enough ago to mask over the proof in the rock stratus, the oxygen could have theoretically been created by a world that was completely devoid of fauna but entirely inhabited by flora. Even if the atmosphere did have susceptible amounts of oxygen embedded therein to be a deterrent for life, the oceanic regions could easily have not had the oxygen content that they have no to support the fish.

Pretty much, your logic follows as this: (Lurch can tell me if I'm doing this correctly!)
P1: Amino acids cannot form spontaneously wherever the oxygen content is too high.
P2: Oxygen has been proven to be on Earth for a sufficiently long time.
C: Amino acids cannot form spontaneously on Earth.

The problem with the argument comes down to when oxygen formed in our atmosphere--after all, it is a minority gas, second to hydrogen--as well as where if the when was too early. If the events mentioned by P1 and P2 do not overlap in space-time, C cannot be firmly established.

Again, I'm shooting at straws here and pointing out possibility. I have not looked up what's proven out there, though I know a good portion out there of what is proven. I'm may pass as an astrophysicist, but definitely not a geophysicist.


"There are some who call me... Link?"
"Carpe Gaium Domesticum!" (Seize the Cucco!)
Zelda: The Grand Adventures | Triforce MUCK
ザ行方不明リンク
悪いユウモアの賢人
The Missing Link is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09212 seconds with 12 queries