Video Game Forums - View Single Post - My "scientific" research proving God exists.

AJ Middleton · 04-17-2005, 09:31 AM

WHOA. He's like a ghost!

Hey folks. I didn't read the link, but I saw the line about about the Big Bang and whatnot:

The first thing wrong with this is in all the years of research, not once has an explosion caused by "chance" create anything. Everytime a star blows up it dies. Every sort of explosion, there is chaos. In fact, the big bang theory contradicts the 2nd law of thermodynamics called entropy.

Yeah, um, how 'bout no. First off, until this year, I had no idea about much evidence for a Big Bang that there was. In fact, my physics professor participates in this research. Particle physicists have been bashing particles together, causing them to heat up to ridiculous temperatures, and watching even smaller particles of matter come from those collisions. Basically, they're trying to recreate the Big Bang, and from what I've heard, they're getting pretty close.

For those of you who have read Angels and Demons, the scientific stuff is all true. Like I said, my physics professor does it.

The Big Bang does NOT violate entropy--please learn what these terms mean before you start throwing them around. A star dies because it has no more hydrogen to fuse together. But in that process, it makes tons of other elements that can later combine to make larger ones and so on. A star works until it becomes a giant chunk of lead, basically.

But why are we talking stars? The Big Bang sprang from a highly concentrated "orb" of condensed energy and matter that GOT COLDER and is still GETTING COLDER. That's right in line with the law of entropy.

But wait. Honestly now. The Law of Thermodynamics is a huge thing, and do you seriously think that the most intelligent and skilled scientists and researchers in the world decided to magically ignore it just to come up with the BB Theory? You've got to me kidding me. Your site, dear friend, is not "research," but rather blatant disregard for over a century of human progress.

Just my two cents.

EDIT: People miss the fact that the difference between rolling dice to get a certain combo and how life came about are totally different processes. With one, you have a specific goal, so odds go down. With another, whatever happens happens. What are the chances of something happening? Looks like 100% to me.

With amino acids coming to be, there was no blueprint for them to follow. It was the protein first, and THEN the rules for making them.

[ April 17, 2005, 09:53 AM: Message edited by: Sir Bolt ]

04-17-2005, 09:31 AM	#23
AJ Middleton Banned Join Date: Dec 1969 Posts: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Points: 2,241.00 Bank: 500.00 Total Points: 2,741.00 Donate	WHOA. He's like a ghost! Hey folks. I didn't read the link, but I saw the line about about the Big Bang and whatnot: The first thing wrong with this is in all the years of research, not once has an explosion caused by "chance" create anything. Everytime a star blows up it dies. Every sort of explosion, there is chaos. In fact, the big bang theory contradicts the 2nd law of thermodynamics called entropy. Yeah, um, how 'bout no. First off, until this year, I had no idea about much evidence for a Big Bang that there was. In fact, my physics professor participates in this research. Particle physicists have been bashing particles together, causing them to heat up to ridiculous temperatures, and watching even smaller particles of matter come from those collisions. Basically, they're trying to recreate the Big Bang, and from what I've heard, they're getting pretty close. For those of you who have read Angels and Demons, the scientific stuff is all true. Like I said, my physics professor does it. The Big Bang does NOT violate entropy--please learn what these terms mean before you start throwing them around. A star dies because it has no more hydrogen to fuse together. But in that process, it makes tons of other elements that can later combine to make larger ones and so on. A star works until it becomes a giant chunk of lead, basically. But why are we talking stars? The Big Bang sprang from a highly concentrated "orb" of condensed energy and matter that GOT COLDER and is still GETTING COLDER. That's right in line with the law of entropy. But wait. Honestly now. The Law of Thermodynamics is a huge thing, and do you seriously think that the most intelligent and skilled scientists and researchers in the world decided to magically ignore it just to come up with the BB Theory? You've got to me kidding me. Your site, dear friend, is not "research," but rather blatant disregard for over a century of human progress. Just my two cents. EDIT: People miss the fact that the difference between rolling dice to get a certain combo and how life came about are totally different processes. With one, you have a specific goal, so odds go down. With another, whatever happens happens. What are the chances of something happening? Looks like 100% to me. With amino acids coming to be, there was no blueprint for them to follow. It was the protein first, and THEN the rules for making them. [ April 17, 2005, 09:53 AM: Message edited by: Sir Bolt ]