Has anyone here read Bill Bryson's 'A Short History of Nearly Everyhting'? Because it neatly refutes most of Phil's arguments without even realising it.
Basically, it's stupid for anyone on this board to attempt to refute universal scientific theory. Considering the opposition that Evolutionary and the Big Bang Theories endured at first, for them to become so widely accepted must mean that they do make sense. If there were flaws in the theories obvious enough for someone on this forum to spot, then they would never have become accepted. |