Video Game Forums - View Single Post

Lurch1982 · 04-06-2006, 06:32 PM

We didn't go to war nor were we led to war on Saddam Hussein's crimes against humanity. We were led to war on the issue of Weapons of Mass Destruction, ties to terrorism, and the imminent danger of Saddam launching a nuclear strike.

You have no grasp on the UN, and the only thing illegitamite thing here are your factually cracked "opinions."

Using your logic, someone should invade the US over killing people in various engagements. How many people would have been saved if someone took out Bush? OMG WEAK LOGIC PWND FTW.

Furthermore, how many more WILL die because of the instability Bush has created in the region? There is more evidence that invading Iraq was a priority since the first inauguration, and its even more disturbing that they though they could just enter in and the people would greet them with hugs, beer, and kisses instead of death, destruction, and IEDs. Simply put, we've managed to fcuk up the entire region for the next few decades as well as eliminate the strongest buffer in the region that singlehandedly prevented Iran from steamrolling its way to Oman and Yeman. Congrats on the forward thinking neo-cons.

04-06-2006, 06:32 PM	#14
Lurch1982 Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Katrinaland, USA Gender: Posts: 9,150 Thanks: 119 Thanked 204 Times in 126 Posts Points: 27,590.51 Bank: 172,759.35 Total Points: 200,349.86 Donate	We didn't go to war nor were we led to war on Saddam Hussein's crimes against humanity. We were led to war on the issue of Weapons of Mass Destruction, ties to terrorism, and the imminent danger of Saddam launching a nuclear strike. You have no grasp on the UN, and the only thing illegitamite thing here are your factually cracked "opinions." Using your logic, someone should invade the US over killing people in various engagements. How many people would have been saved if someone took out Bush? OMG WEAK LOGIC PWND FTW. Furthermore, how many more WILL die because of the instability Bush has created in the region? There is more evidence that invading Iraq was a priority since the first inauguration, and its even more disturbing that they though they could just enter in and the people would greet them with hugs, beer, and kisses instead of death, destruction, and IEDs. Simply put, we've managed to fcuk up the entire region for the next few decades as well as eliminate the strongest buffer in the region that singlehandedly prevented Iran from steamrolling its way to Oman and Yeman. Congrats on the forward thinking neo-cons.