View Single Post
Old 08-13-2006, 06:05 PM   #36
Lurch1982
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Katrinaland, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,226
Thanks: 120
Thanked 220 Times in 131 Posts
Points: 31,525.24
Bank: 241,904.79
Total Points: 273,430.03
 
1.) Reggie Bush played against a first-team defense and made them look foolish in the same vein as Barry Sanders or Marshall Faulk. Alexander also traditionally runs 20+ times a game and racks up more yards. He played, what, two possessions? Come on, use your brain.

2.) Doesn't matter, he still broke the ankles of an NFL defense and made all of your idiotic theories look like they are: uninformed, moronic drivel.

Quote:
Shelty, we complain about your spelling and grammar because it's too difficult to read, no one wants to sit and decipher an argument, I'd rather know what the hell you're talkin bout.
QFT.

Quote:
fine, if u want ill make it a little easier to read. but im not gonna sit and spell every little word out cuz it just takes up too much time. i have a busy schedule and have to be certain places @ certain times. but its not like it was the most impossible thing in the world to read, so dont make it out to be.
If you spend more than five minutes typing these posts, you're a failure at life. Learn to type, it isn't that hard. Spelling errors isn't a problem and nobody really cares about it. The distinct lack of punctuation, coherant thoughts, and this strange mixture of shorthand, internet slang, and illiteracy makes your posts written Chernobyls.

Loco, you are an idiot and you make Shelty look like a fcuking Rhodes Scholar. Did you WATCH the clip? The play came on the first drive by the Saints and he broke a 44 yard run from a first-string offense (minus Deuce) against a first string defense. They let him have it? Yeah, they did if you mean Bush drastically changing the play and countering the Titans defense (breaking an entire team's ankles in the process) and busting a 44 yard run means they just let him have it. He owned them and owned any argument made by any doubters.

Nobody is saying he will be the best RB in the history of the NFL (in order: Jim Brown, Walter Payton, then maybe Emmitt Smith), but we are saying he was the best player in the draft, best possible player for almost every team in the draft, and has an explosive nature that makes him valuable to any team in the league.

Do you watch Seattle games, let alone any running football at all? STFU. Alexander, like almost every back in his vein in the league, break runs later in the game when the defense wears down. He establishes the run in the first few possessions and then breaks them. He's not going to do crap on 6 carries, and if you look at his first six carries in any given game they're likely going to be low.

Going further, Bush played for a quarter and a half and racked up over 50 yards plus another 10 recieving in a game that was practically a running football game. Just like Alexander is going to crack more yards later in the game, Reggie Bush is going to crank in more yards (recieving and rushing) in a full game than in three or four possessions.

Quote:
yeah, get out of the topic, you obviously have no credibility
QFT
Lurch1982 is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08274 seconds with 12 queries