Quote:
Originally posted by Dai Grepher:
I am not the only person in the world that thinks this. |
No, you are. And if anyone else does believe you, then they are simply idiots as well.
The problem with your retarded theory that Zero Mission was meant to be a remake of Metroid's "Gameplay" is that the gameplay in Zero Mission is nothing like the gameplay in Metroid. If anything, the gameplay is identical to the gameplay in Super Metroid and Fusion.
Plenty of people have offered plenty of proof against your stupid theory, but you simply just ignore them. So why should anyone bother listening to you? All of your "proof" is just speculation anyway. I have read ALL of your posts, and I have not read a SINGLE piece of solid proof that isn't just speculation. All you are doing is complaining about level design (which developers DON'T put that much thought into) and semantics of box and manuel descriptions (which is just retarded).
The main problem with your stupid theory is WHY would the developers of this game PURPOSEFULLY make it a prequel and not a remake and NOT make it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR? WHY would they call it a remake if it isn't a remake? All of your "proof" seems to point to the idea that the developers made the game a prequel by accident, which is just retarded as well. Or maybe all of the "remake" stuff was just an accident by the marketing staff, which also is a retarded answer. Either way, your theory makes no sense.
I just find it amazingly retarded that this guy is seriously THIS obsessed with this stupid theory. I mean, he must have spent a TON to free time to BS this crap together. Doesn't this person have a life at all? I mean, seriously. The only way someone can put together a stupid theory like this is if they do nothing besides sit in their parent's house and play Metroid games 24 hours a day. It's just sad. Dai, I pity you. You are a sad, sad, fool.-jay