View Single Post
Old 04-23-2007, 12:07 PM   #12
CaptHayfever
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: (n) - the place where I am
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 20,350
Thanks: 400
Thanked 1,141 Times in 668 Posts
Points: 130,495.10
Bank: 4,160.91
Total Points: 134,656.02
     
Thank you, Ace!

The limit does not exist. Whether it tends towards upper or lower infinity or not, I can't be certain at this point, though I would presume neither.

Why:
Finding limits this intricate, unless your teacher is a sadist who makes you do epsilon-delta proofs for each one, just involves evaluating at the value x approaches, in this case x->0. Having the cubed x in the denominator, though, is not a guaranteed infinite limit, as it might divide out or L'Hospital's rule might be applied. This is why I couldn't answer before solving the obscure integral form.
We can now see that the cubed x does NOT divide out, nor does the "numerator" evaluate to 0, so L'Hospital is out of the question. Our fate is sealed; there is no limit.
I'm inclined towards a full-blown DNE instead of +-infinity because of the logarithms. Put 0 into that first log term, and you're staring at log(-1), which is utterly preposterous, whether the base is 10 or e.

And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
CaptHayfever is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07632 seconds with 12 queries