View Single Post
Old 11-24-2003, 07:40 PM   #34
Lurch1982
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Katrinaland, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,149
Thanks: 119
Thanked 202 Times in 125 Posts
Points: 27,362.21
Bank: 166,050.89
Total Points: 193,413.10
 
Post

Except that a well rounded student body is much better than a carbon copy one. If you take the top X% of applicants just on grades, you may get booksmart people, but people who are unmotivated, or are only doing this for money, or some other undesirable trait. By looking at a wide array of traits in admissions, you can bring in the students that weren't as great on GPAs and tests, but may actually be more productive to the academic environment. It is far more desirable to have people in the school that weren't as highly qualified, but have more motivation or better personal goals than people who were qualified but do nothing but regurgitate what was in the textbook and do not think.
Lurch1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07895 seconds with 12 queries