Quote:
Originally Posted by betasoldier  No, I mean quite the opposite really. I most assuredly agree with you in some case, but definitely I find the opposite in most cases lol. Especially considering for Lurch anything anyone else posts is irrelevant information. Or so says his ego. I could expand upon that but whatever, I don't really care, just making sure Linkman knows. |
I like how I'm apparently the "troll" or whatever when you're the one coming into threads to derail them. If someone is factually wrong (ie: not in line with what is reported), I'm calling them out on it.
Quote:
| Originally Posted by LinkmanDX We're currently there to educate the Iraqi military not to do those sorts of things. It's taking a little longer than expected, but we can't just cut and run with Iraq in the state that it's currently in. |
I've never served in the military in my life and I know that you're not supposed to oversleep when you're supposed to be leading an operation. I also know that it probably isn't a good idea to segment the Army so that they're identical to the militias they recruited from.
Quote:
| The timeline you provided in that link links one article saying that he sought out that particular endorsement. In the same interview, he proceeded to deny or claim everything is out of contest. Why do we suddenly believe one thing and not the other? |
McCain is saying he didn't seek out the kook's endorsement. Kook is claiming McCain went to him. Both are saying the anti-Catholic comments are out of context. Here's a recent example:
McCain personally wooed Hagee for more than a year. Quote:
| The article doesn't give a single piece of evidence that he abandoned his position on the exceptions to abortion, a completely moderate and even non-Bush platform (The article even seems to say that he slammed Bush in 2000 for the very same reason). |
Sounds like he left the exceptions behind to me.