![]() |
| Welcome to the VGF - Discuss Stuff and Games forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(277 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #2 |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | I'll see it on the weekend |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Pensacola, FL Gender: Posts: 5,177 Thanks: 1 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post | A friend of mine went to see the screening last night, so I'll get to hear alllll about it today. However, it looks great. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | This really peeves me off, Batman Begins is getting great reviews (currently 83% on Rotten Tomatoes), but I have to read one of the only newspapers that gives it a BAD review. Heck the reviewer is even quoted on IMDB: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Ikana Castle Posts: 2,482 Thanks: 1 Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts | Well, I've seen it, and it rocks. The Scarecrow is great, but you don't see that much of him, and it's a darn shame. The gadgets are very, very cool. Overall, acting is good, effects are good, fights are good, etc. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: (n) - the place where I am Gender: Posts: 19,110 Thanks: 150 Thanked 700 Times in 452 Posts | Lumpy? And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!" |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: The Netherlands Gender: Posts: 17,094 Thanks: 105 Thanked 177 Times in 119 Posts | Saw it today and I liked it. It was not quite what I expected: it was more an action movie than a comic book movie. There were also some cliches in the plot/script that I think it could've done without. It's miles better than the Joel Schumacher Batmans, but I'm not too sure if it's better than the Tim Burton ones. I missed the Danny Elfman score. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Newbie Join Date: May 2005 Location: Baltimore Posts: 5 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | Saw it last night, really loved it. As good as the first two and 1000 times better than the 3rd and 4th. Great acting, great story, great characters. Just a really good movie. And that's rare these days, from a Batman movie or otherwise. One thing I really loved was the kickass new batmobile. That car could really beat the crap out of the previous batmobiles. I found a cool site that kinda gives more detail about the batmobile, in case anyone's interested: http://www.howstuffworks.com/batmobile.htm Pretty neat, gives both fictional and real info about the batmobile. In any case I really loved the movie. Now I hope they don't screw up the 8 movies that will enevitably follow. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Who cares? No one likes me. Posts: 233 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post | I liked the 3rd and 4th, but as I've stated before, I'm easily pleased. Can't wait to see Scarecrow. He is a tight and demented villan in other Batman media, so you know he must be good here, OR ELSE! |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | Saw it today. Very good movie. There are some things I want to talk about that requires [SPOILERS] I found it very clever that Liam Neeson turned out to be Ra's Al Ghul, especially since he was rumoured/announced to be playing him weeks before Ken Watanabe was cast (which leads me to believe that Watanabe's role was just a ruse to keep the truth away from the public). I LOVED the Scarecrow in the movie (he's one my favourite Batman villains). If only he didn't leave so anticlimactically (taser to the face), though the revelation that he escaped (meaning he could return in one of the sequels) was more than enough consolation. P.S. Who else got chills when it was revealed that the Joker is coming? [/SPOILERS] [ June 18, 2005, 07:15 PM: Message edited by: Gimpy ] |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 1969 Posts: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | Loved it, probably my favorite superhero movie now. I loved how it seemed "real", nothing took away from the movie by being so obviously CGI that it stood out (like some stuff in Spiderman). Joker thing was awesome. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 1969 Posts: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | I saw it today and liked it better than any of the previous ones. I liked how they didn't kill off the villains (NEVER liked that in the previous ones) and kept it fairly open for a Scarcrow or Ra's al Ghul return in a future movie (Not buying Ra's dead). The joker thing was a mixed bag for me. It was halfway a great device to throw in there, but it also seemed like they were trying to club the audience over the head with it. Potential problems with any joker based sequel is that whoever they cast is going to be following in Jack's shadow AND they're going to have a few problems with brand confusion. Dorks like myself can tell that the Burton Batman is from a different source material than Batman begins but I doubt the average moron is going to make the distinction at first. Then again, that movie was released in like 1989... I'd rather them do someone like Clayface than the joker anyway. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | An interesting thing I read on IMDB the other day was that the fans want Mark Hamill (aka Luke Skywalker) to play the Joker is the sequel (probably based on the fact that he has played the animated joker, very well, for the last 12-13 years or so). |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,218 Thanks: 9 Thanked 40 Times in 31 Posts | Quote:
Personally my favourite Batman villains are (in kind-of order): The Joker, Scarecrow, The Riddler, and The Penguin | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Threading the jeweled thrones of earth under my sandalled feet Gender: Posts: 2,960 Thanks: 4 Thanked 43 Times in 37 Posts | I wouldn't mind seeing another Joker - and I wonder who they would cast (isn't Mark Hamill too old? I mean, he is the perfect actor for the voice, but otherwise... 0.o). personally, Nicholsen wasn't my favorite - he wasn't loud or eccentric enough to be the Joker, although he did a fairly good job of it. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 1969 Posts: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | This movie was way more effective using lesser known villains like Ra's al goul and Scarecrown than it could have been with any other villain combo. I think there's way more potential with another Ra's al Goul appearance than with Joker. If they're going to do another villain, I'd rather see Clayface get the screen treatment over anyone else. Mark Hamill is ancient and physically looks horrid. No. God no. I keep hearing Larry the robot from Time Squad. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Pensacola, FL Gender: Posts: 5,177 Thanks: 1 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post | I dunno... i've always considered Clayface to be the lamest Batman villain... Well, that's not true. The Riddler. I always thought he was useless because The Joker could easily perform his job too. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |