![]() |
| Welcome to the Video Game Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(277 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,278 Thanks: 9 Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts | Alright, I went to see Lady in the Water yesterday. I liked it. We can all agree that M. Night Shyamalan has a very polarized fan base. You either like his films or you don't. I personally believe that Shyamalan was unfairly typecast, after the success of the Sixth Sense, as both a director of only thrillers and a director that includes twists in all his movies. After The Sixth Sense, Shyamalan released 4 films: Unbreakable, Signs, The Village, and this film. I can say that of these films, only Signs can be considered a thriller. OK, back to this film. Lady in the Water is very different from Shyamalan's previous films. For starters, it's more fantasy than thriller. Sure, there's this scary wolf-creature, but other than one jump scare, it's no more scary than the big bad wolf. A criticism of this film that I have been reading is that M. Night Shyamalan upgrades his acting role from cameo to major character. The critics say it's self-indulgent, but I personally didn't mind it. It isn't the first time a director cast himself in a major role. Plus, I would have to say that ALL the supporting characters in this film has a major role to play. Speaking of critics, Shyamalan decided to poke a jab at film critics, but including one in the story that keeps on ranting on how there is "no originality left." Overall, I found the film enjoyable. I would say it would be my third favourite Shyamalan film. If you're interested, my ranking of his films are this:
|
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dirty Looks Gender: Posts: 8,040 Thanks: 212 Thanked 146 Times in 126 Posts | Im going to check it out when i comes out on dvd, i dont go to theater much. Quote:
I didnt like the fact that the ones we dont speak of werent real, Expesaly that you found half way through the movie, not even towards the end. | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Gender: Posts: 3,278 Thanks: 9 Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts | Quote:
I've come to accept the whole "creatures in the woods" thing as a MacGuffin (a plot device that motivates the characters and advances the story, but has little other relevance to the story itself). I believe the true plot involved how the elder's were using fear to keep everyone secluded in the the village and away from the dangers in the outside world. | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dirty Looks Gender: Posts: 8,040 Thanks: 212 Thanked 146 Times in 126 Posts | Quote:
Yes I know that, I still think it's a great movie but, I could have been better if you found later, I meant that was a huge Plot twist, normally something like that goese on like 3/4 through the movie. | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Pending. Gender: Posts: 5,788 Thanks: 127 Thanked 117 Times in 82 Posts | I think the preview before where they were whispering turned me off. I hate low whispering like that. It is not creepy, it's just plain stupid. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |