![]() |
| Welcome to the VGF - Discuss Stuff and Games forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(277 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Southeast Georgia Posts: 30 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | Jurassic Park IV and Indiana Jones 4 According to Crave Online, Development Hell reports that director Steven Spielberg just participated in a Q&A at the University of Southern California where he gave updates on both Jurassic Park IV and Indiana Jones 4. http://comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=11949 |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: The oversized rock of Hawaii. Gender: Posts: 5,665 Thanks: 5 Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts | Already knew about Indiana Jones, but ANOTHER Jurassic Park? After the last one pretty much sucked? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: The Netherlands Gender: Posts: 17,093 Thanks: 104 Thanked 176 Times in 118 Posts | I remember when the first JP was out someone told me there were going to be at least 3 sequels. I didn't believe him, but apparantly he was right. I didn't even like The Lost World that much, and JPIII was awful. I take it Spielberg is not going to direct this one? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Southeast Georgia Posts: 30 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | Well he did produce the third. And yes, the third smelt of something aweful. The Lost World was alright, should of stuck more to the book and if they did that, we wouldn't be here right now discussing this. It would of been far over by now. Seriously though, what else can they cover? Jurassic Park has died. Thank you, Alltaia |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Katrinaland, USA Gender: Posts: 9,118 Thanks: 119 Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts | Indy IV is bordering on one of those "never got out of preproduction" things. Plus, with Lucas' recent track records, I'm afraid. Jurassic Park IV will sell to the same mouthbreathing droolers that went to see Jurassic Park III. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: ACCESS DENIED Posts: 16 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | I personally loved all of the previous movies, but that's just me. Maybe it's because I'm such a dinosaur expert. I thouroghly hope that JPIV is as enjoyable as the first three. This is Parasaurolophus Man signing out. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: The Netherlands Gender: Posts: 17,093 Thanks: 104 Thanked 176 Times in 118 Posts | You liked JP because you are a dinosaur expert? I'm by no means an expert, but I read a lot about dinosaurs when I was a kid and I was very aware of the innacuracies, and that most of it was speculation. The biggest innacuraccy is of course the size of the Velociraptor (why they insisted on making it a Velociraptor when they could've gone with Deinonychus, which resembles Velociraptor, and is much closer to the height of the creatures in the movie). Aside from colour and sounds (which can only be guessed) there were a lot of things that were speculated: - the Iguana frill and the poision of the dilophosaurus - the intelligence, and co-operative skills of the velociraptor - the hunting abilities of the T-rex. - more I can't think of right now Despite all this, I really enjoyed the first movie (I even own it on DVD). The 2nd one was not nearly as good, especially when they went Godzilla at the end. The 3rd was very poor. I saw the beginning of it a while ago, and how they got Grant back on the island was ridiculous. I also thought it was incredibly stupid that they spend two films building up the T-Rex as the most dangerous animal that ever lived and then suddenly claim the Spinosaurus is even bigger (it wasn't) and more dangerous (not likely). |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Zelda Mod Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: All over the place Gender: Posts: 12,325 Thanks: 86 Thanked 438 Times in 269 Posts | Quote:
*runs off sobbing* When I was very young, I knew more about dinosaurs than anyone else in the history of the universe. Or thought I did. I was so pissed off that they had the T-Rex offed by a dinosaur less than half its apparent weight I thought I was going to freaking explode. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Threading the jeweled thrones of earth under my sandalled feet Gender: Posts: 2,985 Thanks: 4 Thanked 45 Times in 39 Posts | When did they do that? And likewise, Cam. I could have been a university professor 10 years ago. Now I can't even pronounce the names anymore./ |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: The Netherlands Gender: Posts: 17,093 Thanks: 104 Thanked 176 Times in 118 Posts | The Spinosaurus in JPIII killed the T-Rex. That's what I meant by Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: ACCESS DENIED Posts: 16 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | I'm one of those people that enjoy almost any movie (Codenamed EPG, for Easily Pleased Guy) unless it's incredibly stupid... like Princess Diaries. I don't like the Jurassic Park series for the accuracy, of which there is little. I most certainly hope IV is more accurate. The list of inaccuracies goes on and on. But I'll summarize it in laymen's terms: Velociraptor: Too large, too smart, too fast, and lacks feathers Brachiosaurus: Neck too high (It'd get brain damage at any higher than a 20 degree angle) Parasaurolophus: None Triceratops: None Metriacanthosaurus: None (Of course all you see of it is it's name on the embryo) Tyrannosaurus: Lacks feathers Dilophosaurus: Way, way too small, and what the hell is with the frilled lizard frill? Gallimimus: None, unless ornithomimosaurs had feathers Compsognathus: Too fierce, lacks feathers Stegosaurus: None Pachycephalosaurus: Too small Mamenchisaurus: See Brachiosaurus Pteranodon: Too strong and too fierce Corythosaurus: None Spinosaurus: Too strong Ankylosaurus: None Ceratosaurus: None |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Zelda Mod Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: All over the place Gender: Posts: 12,325 Thanks: 86 Thanked 438 Times in 269 Posts | Actually we don't know the Tyrannosaurus had feathers - we do know it probably didn't have movement-based eyesight, and probably had an olfactory sense that would've let it find you even if it was half-blind. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Threading the jeweled thrones of earth under my sandalled feet Gender: Posts: 2,985 Thanks: 4 Thanked 45 Times in 39 Posts | Also, we do know that T-Rex > Just about everything. Yeah, just about everything. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: I don't know. Where do I live? Gender: Posts: 5,648 Thanks: 7 Thanked 159 Times in 112 Posts | I have always HATED the Jurassic Park series. Maybe thats because the first time I saw it I was around 5 or so. It scared the piss outta me. I could care less about JP 4. I'm more interested in seeing what happens to that Indiana Jones 4 idea. I love those movies. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |