Global Warming - Page 3

***ZeldaGirl*** · 08-01-2007, 08:42 PM

It was more of a political attack, and did not actually contribute anything.

Goodbye.

ChuckleHuck · 08-02-2007, 09:02 AM

Yeah...It's hard to center the joke on global warming in the first place.

And now I'm just going to edit my post to something...better.

(This is what happens when people actually listen to my stupidity. Shocker, huh?)

Benito Mussolini · 09-26-2007, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Funny. One year and 11 months ago, Nature made two states its bitch and they still haven't recovered.

The Netherlands made nature it's bitch like forty years ago and Nature still hasn't recovered.

Human-beings have kicked natures ass before and we can do it again. Are we going to let something like 10 more feet of water kick our ass?! Come on, we're the ****ing human-race! If nature tries to take out Manhattan, we'll build a dam. If nature shoots lighting bolts at the dam, we'll build a lighting rod. If Nature starts a fire in the building with the lighting rod, we'll pump the water out of the sea we built the dam for and use it to put out the fire. If nature hits us with a famine, we'll chop down half the Amazon rain forest and use it for farms. Not only do we solve the famine, we kick nature's ass in the process.

Don't be a *****. Even Cuba didn't let nature throw it's PMSy mood-swings at it. Mother nature needs to realize her place in the world; chained to the human race's kitchen.

I am nobody · 09-26-2007, 08:57 AM

^ PLease tell me you're not serious. If not.....

HEAT WAVE. The rainforest will be dead before the famine. The heat wave will kill peole inside the dam. Global wrming will not equal longer growing seasons as you seem to think. It will mean NO GROWING SEASONS. The plants will simply die before they become of any use. There will not be more fresh water either. The lakes will simply evaporate. Most species will go exctinct likely including people. More C02 is not a good thing unless you have found a way to stop it from killing you. Now were are these advantages you were talking about?

Note: My computer is doing the stupid typing thing again so I can't correct any problems without having to retype the whole thing. So if there are any mistakes ( I know there is at least one ) just ignore them.

Sarai and Samiel · 09-26-2007, 10:15 AM

Why was this revived without a real argument?

SUM1 PLZ LOK.

Lurch1982 · 09-26-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benito Mussolini

The Netherlands made nature it's bitch like forty years ago and Nature still hasn't recovered.

Human-beings have kicked natures ass before and we can do it again. Are we going to let something like 10 more feet of water kick our ass?! Come on, we're the ****ing human-race! If nature tries to take out Manhattan, we'll build a dam. If nature shoots lighting bolts at the dam, we'll build a lighting rod. If Nature starts a fire in the building with the lighting rod, we'll pump the water out of the sea we built the dam for and use it to put out the fire. If nature hits us with a famine, we'll chop down half the Amazon rain forest and use it for farms. Not only do we solve the famine, we kick nature's ass in the process.

Don't be a *****. Even Cuba didn't let nature throw it's PMSy mood-swings at it. Mother nature needs to realize her place in the world; chained to the human race's kitchen.

I could dignify this with a response, but I don't see the point. Idiot.

08-02-2007, 09:02 AM	#42
ChuckleHuck Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Next to this man in rags with a knife. He seems very friendly! Gender: Posts: 1,844 Thanks: 83 Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts Points: 1,871.44 Bank: 0.12 Total Points: 1,871.56 Donate	Yeah...It's hard to center the joke on global warming in the first place. And now I'm just going to edit my post to something...better. (This is what happens when people actually listen to my stupidity. Shocker, huh?) Last edited by ChuckleHuck; 08-02-2007 at 09:07 AM.

09-26-2007, 10:15 AM	#45
Sarai and Samiel Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Aisle 12, between the kumquats and the radicchio. Gender: Posts: 2,285 Thanks: 163 Thanked 124 Times in 86 Posts Points: 3,316.97 Bank: 92,324.85 Total Points: 95,641.82 Donate	CA-CLINK. Why was this revived without a real argument? SUM1 PLZ LOK.

08-01-2007, 08:42 PM	#41
*ZeldaGirl* Venting SuperMod Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Why do YOU want to know...? Gender: Posts: 12,328 Thanks: 541 Thanked 904 Times in 612 Posts Points: 34,665.04 Bank: 624,225.55 Total Points: 658,890.58 Donate	It was more of a political attack, and did not actually contribute anything. Goodbye.

09-26-2007, 08:57 AM	#44
I am nobody Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Here's a hint: There are people here. Gender: Posts: 3,361 Thanks: 125 Thanked 156 Times in 104 Posts Blog Entries: 4 Points: 404.59 Bank: 13,682.63 Total Points: 14,087.22 Donate	^ PLease tell me you're not serious. If not..... HEAT WAVE. The rainforest will be dead before the famine. The heat wave will kill peole inside the dam. Global wrming will not equal longer growing seasons as you seem to think. It will mean NO GROWING SEASONS. The plants will simply die before they become of any use. There will not be more fresh water either. The lakes will simply evaporate. Most species will go exctinct likely including people. More C02 is not a good thing unless you have found a way to stop it from killing you. Now were are these advantages you were talking about? Note: My computer is doing the stupid typing thing again so I can't correct any problems without having to retype the whole thing. So if there are any mistakes ( I know there is at least one ) just ignore them.