|
| Welcome to the Video Game Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(278 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #23 | |
| Guest | Quote:
*joins* *unjoins* I would actually have sign up without having to give you a nasty mood had the idea been written out in sense. I can't understand a thing you wrote about the whole idea. | |
|
| | #24 |
| Guest | Hehe, sorry. Well, do you have any idea what a free-play is? Or what URPG is? This is basically a normal one of those, except 1) It's only about one person. 2) It's told from several perspectives. Each person (except me) chooses one set of two. The writing is told from one of these perspectives at first in the post. Then, at some random point, you can switch to either the Omnipotent, or normal, perspective, or the other half of your perspective set. Then, at another random point in your post, you can switch either back to the first or to the third point of view. You might end up switching several times if you have a very large post. Should I give you an example? |
|
| | #26 |
| Guest | basically we tell the story from our two perspectives. the mystical ball of energy changes to the weapon of the perspective it belongs to. Say im telling it in the overreactive. the guy would tend to over react to every little thing and the "mystical ball of energy" would transform into claws for the guy to use. Only i can tell it in the overreactive/nonchalant perspectives, you guys use the pairs you picked, plus normal. |
|
| | #27 |
| Guest | I think I get it... I'll take Paranoid/ (too) Trusting Paranoid Weapon: I'll take a scimitar. Trusting Weapon: Technically this be nothing right? Why would you carry a weapon if you trust people? I'll take a variation of a dagger a stilleto. Paranoid Techniques Sultan's Fury: Multiple sword swipes combined followed by a large battlecry and a quick lunge Sand Strike: A sandstorm is emitted from the scimitar blinding the enemy for a limited time allowing the user to get in a powerfuld slash Trusting Techniques Eye of the Needle: Throws the stilleto with perfect precision (as if the stilleto sees), and then makes it come back to the user Lunacy: Stabs madly Overdrive for Paranoid Swords of the Seven: Creates 7 flying scimitars which all attack the enemy at once Overdrive for Trusting Dagger Danger: The Stilleto gets a mind of it's own and pursues the enemy by it's self. Is that good? |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |