|
| Welcome to the Video Game Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(279 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ehhh? What? Where am I?! Gender: Posts: 3,010 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | True, No Child Left Behind didn't exactly work. But should that mean that national education standards are no go? I'm a bit split on this. Yes, national standards COULD mean that teachers would be less flexible. But really...the VERY disproportionate education standards between the different states...it's just unfair, you know? Thoughts, ramblings? ...Flames? *dodges* |
| |
| | #2 |
| Professional Lurker Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: New Hyrule, Washington, US Gender: Posts: 17,128 Thanks: 405 Thanked 606 Times in 368 Posts | I honestly don't agree with a federal Board of Education at all. However, to suggest a compromise to the issue of having some federal regulation without federal mandates, what I think should be done is to have federal suggestions and guidance about what should be taught in schools but not have any federal mandate (read: national standardised test) to enforce it. Thus, along with school vouchers and whatnot, kids should be able to go to schools that support the federal suggestions. ![]() "There are some who call me... Link?" ![]() "Carpe Gaium Domesticum!" (Seize the Cucco!) Zelda: The Grand Adventures | Triforce MUCK ザ行方不明リンク 悪いユウモアの賢人 |
| |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |