Reggie Bush!?!?!? - Page 6 - VGF

Sir Delicious Rightfoot · 08-23-2006, 01:29 PM

I think the no negativity has been tossed aside.

Or maybe I'm in my own little world.

Probably the latter. Anyway, whoever does mod this place should sticky this topic. As a point of reference, so down the road no one can say "I don't remember sayin that"

shelty87 · 08-23-2006, 01:48 PM

hey, i wasnt being condescending towards u. we may have different opinions on how reggie bush may perform in his rookie yr, but that gives u no right to size me up, just like that. maybe if u had more than 1 frame of reference on me, id say ok, n maybe im not sht here, but u dont......and THATS speaking the truth.

Lurch1982 · 08-23-2006, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idlewild

I think the no negativity has been tossed aside.

Or maybe I'm in my own little world.

Probably the latter. Anyway, whoever does mod this place should sticky this topic. As a point of reference, so down the road no one can say "I don't remember sayin that"

Well, we're also in a forum where nobody with any sort of power goes.

Good luck on getting anyone to sticky the post, they're too lazy to make someone a mod.

Quote:

maybe if u had more than 1 frame of reference on me, iNOBODYCARES

So a thread with 100+ posts, half of which involve you making yourself look idiotic doesn't count, right? You've built a framework of what you are through the posts: a backpeddling, wishy-washy, know-nothing kid that gets routinely owned in any sort of discussion.

Mark Prior · 08-23-2006, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shelty87

hey, i wasnt being condescending towards u. we may have different opinions on how reggie bush may perform in his rookie yr, but that gives u no right to size me up, just like that. maybe if u had more than 1 frame of reference on me, id say ok, n maybe im not sht here, but u dont......and THATS speaking the truth.

what? is there a sentence in there somewhere?

Lurch1982 · 09-10-2006, 05:31 PM

To the idiots:

Week 1:

Bush: 141 all purpose yards (61 rushing on 14 carries for 4.4/carry, 8 receptions for 58 yards and 7.3/catch, and 22 return yards on 3 returns for 7.7/return).

Williams: 3 tackles (2 solo).

Yeah, overrated my ass. How dumb do the Texans look when they have some jabroni who got 32 rushing yards. Awesome pick guys.

Mark Prior · 09-10-2006, 06:04 PM

we win.

Sir Delicious Rightfoot · 09-10-2006, 06:14 PM

Somewhere down the line, you have to feel sorry for them. To add insult to injury Davis goes out for the season.

Can we say screwed?

**March of the Covenant** · 09-10-2006, 06:18 PM

Screwed.

shelty87 · 09-18-2006, 09:06 PM

havent been on in a while, figured id give the vgf addiction a rest.

ok, bush had a good opening week. thats a valid point, but let me remind you of something: it was against CLEVELAND. maybe if he did the same vs. the giants, falcons, ravens, bucs, steelers, bears, or seahawks.....then id give him the respect, but on a team like cleveland (who gave up 145 to rudi.....granted rudi is 1 of the best backs) its not nearly as impressive. he did do well receiving the ball tho, 52 yards on 7 receptions isnt bad at all.

ok, lets look at game 2, this time against green bay (a terrible team so id think bush would do well).

6 carries for 5 yards. even though its only 6 carries, it speaks for itself. again, the receiving game was nice for bush. 68 yards on 8 receptions. i admit i am liking bush receiving the ball, but i think it might be because he is on pace for 120 catches, a feat only accomplished 5 times in the history of the nfl (m. harrison-127, h. moore-123, j. rice-122, c. carter-122[twice]; the next best was 119 by i. bruce).

my judgement of reggie will be up for decision based on his next 4 games. if he does well against defenses like atlanta, carolina, tampa bay, and philly, then ill give reggie the props he would then deserve.

Lurch1982 · 09-18-2006, 09:12 PM

You play the schedule...if you don't have the Steelers and Colts scheduled, you can't play them.

Saints were also down early to Green Bay and threw way more last week. They didn't really run in general.

I wouldn't include Tampa and Philly. Tampa looks horrendous and Philly just lost Kearse for the year.

Sir Delicious Rightfoot · 09-18-2006, 09:14 PM

Was about to say the same thing about Tampa. Any calls for Gradkowski or Rattay by mid-season? I believe so.

shelty87 · 09-18-2006, 09:19 PM

ok, ill agree w/ u on the tampa and philly point. i only included tampa though cuz they put up a good defense year in and year out. maybe this is the year they get worse, but that defense has been very dependable the past 4-5 seasons at the very least. philly's defense wasnt spectacular to begin w/. it was good, but not great, and kearse was a big blow, but he's still just 1 guy......but ill agree.

as far as playing who is on the schedule, ur right. but because u run well against a weak defense doesnt mean its something to brag about. run on a good defense and then talk. if he does well, then im proven wrong, but if he runs well on a team like - cleveland - then there is still plenty of doubt

Lurch1982 · 09-18-2006, 09:22 PM

Cleveland's D is still deceptive. They may not be the Steelers, but they can put together decent coverage and schemes to pop a big play every so often. They'd be better if they wouldn't have traded the D-line to Denver for that chumpchange Droughns.

Sir Delicious Rightfoot · 09-18-2006, 09:36 PM

Kearse is a huge blow. Having a disruptive lineman gives the other lineman an advantage. If a team leaves him one on one, he's getting through, if a team tries to double him up, someone else is getting through. You just can't get any better than a dominant force on the line (unless you have, 2 or 3).

08-23-2006, 01:29 PM	#101
Sir Delicious Rightfoot I'MA FIRIN MAH ADVENTURE BUS! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Birmingham, AL Gender: Posts: 13,135 Thanks: 941 Thanked 660 Times in 385 Posts Points: 43,582.35 Bank: 510,958.47 Total Points: 554,540.82 Donate	I think the no negativity has been tossed aside. Or maybe I'm in my own little world. Probably the latter. Anyway, whoever does mod this place should sticky this topic. As a point of reference, so down the road no one can say "I don't remember sayin that" __________________ Season 1- Coming to a Youtube near you....whenever

09-10-2006, 06:14 PM	#107
Sir Delicious Rightfoot I'MA FIRIN MAH ADVENTURE BUS! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Birmingham, AL Gender: Posts: 13,135 Thanks: 941 Thanked 660 Times in 385 Posts Points: 43,582.35 Bank: 510,958.47 Total Points: 554,540.82 Donate	Somewhere down the line, you have to feel sorry for them. To add insult to injury Davis goes out for the season. Can we say screwed? __________________ Season 1- Coming to a Youtube near you....whenever

09-18-2006, 09:14 PM	#111
Sir Delicious Rightfoot I'MA FIRIN MAH ADVENTURE BUS! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Birmingham, AL Gender: Posts: 13,135 Thanks: 941 Thanked 660 Times in 385 Posts Points: 43,582.35 Bank: 510,958.47 Total Points: 554,540.82 Donate	Was about to say the same thing about Tampa. Any calls for Gradkowski or Rattay by mid-season? I believe so. __________________ Season 1- Coming to a Youtube near you....whenever

09-18-2006, 09:36 PM	#114
Sir Delicious Rightfoot I'MA FIRIN MAH ADVENTURE BUS! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Birmingham, AL Gender: Posts: 13,135 Thanks: 941 Thanked 660 Times in 385 Posts Points: 43,582.35 Bank: 510,958.47 Total Points: 554,540.82 Donate	Kearse is a huge blow. Having a disruptive lineman gives the other lineman an advantage. If a team leaves him one on one, he's getting through, if a team tries to double him up, someone else is getting through. You just can't get any better than a dominant force on the line (unless you have, 2 or 3). __________________ Season 1- Coming to a Youtube near you....whenever

08-23-2006, 01:48 PM	#102
shelty87 Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Gender: Posts: 88 Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Points: 2,537.00 Bank: 3,562.25 Total Points: 6,099.25 Donate	hey, i wasnt being condescending towards u. we may have different opinions on how reggie bush may perform in his rookie yr, but that gives u no right to size me up, just like that. maybe if u had more than 1 frame of reference on me, id say ok, n maybe im not sht here, but u dont......and THATS speaking the truth.

09-10-2006, 05:31 PM	#105
Lurch1982 Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Katrinaland, USA Gender: Posts: 9,117 Thanks: 119 Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts Points: 25,412.61 Bank: 136,219.57 Total Points: 161,632.18 Donate	To the idiots: Week 1: Bush: 141 all purpose yards (61 rushing on 14 carries for 4.4/carry, 8 receptions for 58 yards and 7.3/catch, and 22 return yards on 3 returns for 7.7/return). Williams: 3 tackles (2 solo). Yeah, overrated my ass. How dumb do the Texans look when they have some jabroni who got 32 rushing yards. Awesome pick guys.

09-10-2006, 06:04 PM	#106
Mark Prior Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Gender: Posts: 305 Thanks: 21 Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts Points: 6,251.56 Bank: 828.59 Total Points: 7,080.15 Donate	we win.

09-10-2006, 06:18 PM	#108
March of the Covenant I VOTED Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: On a deserted island Gender: Posts: 10,548 Thanks: 754 Thanked 314 Times in 220 Posts Points: 12,551.46 Bank: 100,700.50 Total Points: 113,251.96 Donate	Screwed.

09-18-2006, 09:06 PM	#109
shelty87 Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Gender: Posts: 88 Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Points: 2,537.00 Bank: 3,562.25 Total Points: 6,099.25 Donate	havent been on in a while, figured id give the vgf addiction a rest. ok, bush had a good opening week. thats a valid point, but let me remind you of something: it was against CLEVELAND. maybe if he did the same vs. the giants, falcons, ravens, bucs, steelers, bears, or seahawks.....then id give him the respect, but on a team like cleveland (who gave up 145 to rudi.....granted rudi is 1 of the best backs) its not nearly as impressive. he did do well receiving the ball tho, 52 yards on 7 receptions isnt bad at all. ok, lets look at game 2, this time against green bay (a terrible team so id think bush would do well). 6 carries for 5 yards. even though its only 6 carries, it speaks for itself. again, the receiving game was nice for bush. 68 yards on 8 receptions. i admit i am liking bush receiving the ball, but i think it might be because he is on pace for 120 catches, a feat only accomplished 5 times in the history of the nfl (m. harrison-127, h. moore-123, j. rice-122, c. carter-122[twice]; the next best was 119 by i. bruce). my judgement of reggie will be up for decision based on his next 4 games. if he does well against defenses like atlanta, carolina, tampa bay, and philly, then ill give reggie the props he would then deserve.

09-18-2006, 09:12 PM	#110
Lurch1982 Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Katrinaland, USA Gender: Posts: 9,117 Thanks: 119 Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts Points: 25,412.61 Bank: 136,219.57 Total Points: 161,632.18 Donate	You play the schedule...if you don't have the Steelers and Colts scheduled, you can't play them. Saints were also down early to Green Bay and threw way more last week. They didn't really run in general. I wouldn't include Tampa and Philly. Tampa looks horrendous and Philly just lost Kearse for the year.

09-18-2006, 09:19 PM	#112
shelty87 Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Gender: Posts: 88 Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Points: 2,537.00 Bank: 3,562.25 Total Points: 6,099.25 Donate	ok, ill agree w/ u on the tampa and philly point. i only included tampa though cuz they put up a good defense year in and year out. maybe this is the year they get worse, but that defense has been very dependable the past 4-5 seasons at the very least. philly's defense wasnt spectacular to begin w/. it was good, but not great, and kearse was a big blow, but he's still just 1 guy......but ill agree. as far as playing who is on the schedule, ur right. but because u run well against a weak defense doesnt mean its something to brag about. run on a good defense and then talk. if he does well, then im proven wrong, but if he runs well on a team like - cleveland - then there is still plenty of doubt

09-18-2006, 09:22 PM	#113
Lurch1982 Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Katrinaland, USA Gender: Posts: 9,117 Thanks: 119 Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts Points: 25,412.61 Bank: 136,219.57 Total Points: 161,632.18 Donate	Cleveland's D is still deceptive. They may not be the Steelers, but they can put together decent coverage and schemes to pop a big play every so often. They'd be better if they wouldn't have traded the D-line to Denver for that chumpchange Droughns.