Video Game Forums  

Welcome to the Video Game Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   Video Game Forums > Other Entertainment > Sports and Fitness Forum: Now Featuring Failup Rivers
Cheat Codes Arcade-(278 Games) RPG Donate Member Forums Daily Crossword Puzzle

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2008, 04:49 PM   #21
 
Crazyswordsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Booyaville (yeah!)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,584
Thanks: 633
Thanked 471 Times in 311 Posts
Points: 167,385.15
Bank: 77,775.54
Total Points: 245,160.69
  
^Well, he played at Delaware and almost won the I-AA national championship, so he's probably better than a lot of I-A QBs from non-BCS schools. -CSM
Crazyswordsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 05:27 PM   #22
What's this what's this a trick with a twist?
 
GURU ANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shhhh, it's a secret right now
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,619
Thanks: 1,146
Thanked 757 Times in 438 Posts
Points: 25,878.80
Bank: 1,348,323.25
Total Points: 1,374,202.05
     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurch1982 View Post
I don't think ATL can compete in an offensive shootout in the NFC South. They're not established, and they don't have a QB or a line. I would have built on defense. They passed on way too many good defensive players to justify taking Ryan that high. There's a better chance of them taking the division by being defensively dominant through the draft and running an efficient offense than there is of them building up a high powered offense at this point.
That's my point, the offense is decent enough if we would have plugged our line up in FA and the draft, we'd be set on offense. Redman is efficient enough, Roddy and Laurent are coming on strong, and Joe is of course the vet, get yourself a decent guard and LT and you're good to go.

Defense? Way too many holes, we have no earthly idea who's going to start at corner because Bobby Bitch managed to alienate half the team's best players (come on, when WARRICK DUNN starts second guessing you, you're far from okay). Keith is getting older and needs support (that's been taken care of) and our D-Line is ****ty because we released Grady and Rod Coleman . It seems as if instead of trying to compete we're attempting to rebuild, and doing a ****ty ass job of it. We play in too strong of a division to be piecing thigns together. New Orleans will light us up, Tampa will run us over, and our games with Carolina will continue to be lost 6-3.
GURU ANT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 09:04 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mizzou
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,995
Thanks: 81
Thanked 84 Times in 68 Posts
Points: 1,266.77
Bank: 322,569.70
Total Points: 323,836.47
Chiefs did something good for once. The best part about it is we got Franklin from Mizzou!



I'm still pissed we traded away Jared Allen though. What was with that?
Shine Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:58 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Katrinaland, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,278
Thanks: 122
Thanked 253 Times in 140 Posts
Points: 36,465.03
Bank: 338,725.11
Total Points: 375,190.14
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazyswordsman View Post
^Well, he played at Delaware and almost won the I-AA national championship, so he's probably better than a lot of I-A QBs from non-BCS schools. -CSM
He didn't face pro-style defenses. I wouldn't expect an immediate impact, if any. Dumb pick IMO when there were clearly better steals later on in the draft.
Lurch1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 11:30 AM   #25
What's this what's this a trick with a twist?
 
GURU ANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shhhh, it's a secret right now
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,619
Thanks: 1,146
Thanked 757 Times in 438 Posts
Points: 25,878.80
Bank: 1,348,323.25
Total Points: 1,374,202.05
     
Steelers take Dixon wtf?
GURU ANT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:40 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Katrinaland, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,278
Thanks: 122
Thanked 253 Times in 140 Posts
Points: 36,465.03
Bank: 338,725.11
Total Points: 375,190.14
 
^My guess is they "Slash" him or convert him to WR/CB. Seems like he could fit that Kordell Stewart model. Shame he blew up his season with an injury, probably would have went higher and possibly to a team that would use him as a QB instead of "slashing" him.
Lurch1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:10 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 10,439
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Points: 43,658.03
Bank: 1,847.49
Total Points: 45,505.52
 
G-Men addressed all their weak spots, so I'm content with the draft. Hopefully our safeties play well.
Brandon2390 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 04:40 PM   #28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: up ur ass
Gender: Male
Posts: 142
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Points: 7,658.44
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 7,658.44
  
i dont know why the bears still have rex he sucks and the bears got a realy good wide recever so thats good
Da Bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
 


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Points Per Thread View: 1.00
Points Per Thread: 15.00
Points Per Post: 5.00


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
© 1999-2007 VGF.com. All Rights Reserved. All content contained herein is property of VGF, Inc. VGF is not affiliated with any video game companies. Logos, trademarks, names, images, etc. are property of their respective companies.
Page generated in 0.14993 seconds with 13 queries