1. New forums are up at http://www.vgf.com/phpBB3. You will need to use the forgot password feature to be able to login. If you do not receive the password reset e-mail, send me a PM.

National Dunce Day Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Politics, Philosophy, and Religion' started by I am nobody, Nov 7, 2016.

  1.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    What happened historically is moot unless you also shift the historical landscape to how it is today. Though Texas is still very much red, it may well be purple in a couple elections. California meanwhile has dramatically shifted left since voting for the first Bush. Of course, even California at that much of a gap doesn't necessarily guarantee a victory (hopefully nothing can guarantee anyone victory), but it is a key piece to the puzzle of making elections easier. It's plausible that over time it will shift back as well, but the people pushing for the popular vote movement aren't thinking that way.
  2.  
    CaptHayfever

    CaptHayfever Awesome Smash Bros Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    36,742
    Location:
    (n) - the place where I am
    People who are suddenly pushing for the popular vote aren't thinking that way. People who've been pushing for the popular vote for decades are well aware that it swings both ways.

    And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
    Bomby likes this.
  3.  
    I am nobody

    I am nobody I am not mean spam Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    12,025
    Location:
    -89.97814998,-42.2333493
    Republicans losing appeal is their problem, not the popular vote's.


    EDIT: And for what it's worth, the GOP would be basically screwed if Texas went reliably purple, anyway, so the Electoral College isn't changing much under that premise.
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
    CaptHayfever likes this.
  4.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    Most of the people calling for a popular vote now have two things on their mind. Bush v. Gore and Donald Trump is literally Hitler. They don't realize that it could potentially backfire because predicting the electoral map very far into the future is unreliable at best. Even just 10 years ago, I don't think anyone would have predicted what happened in 2016.
  5.  
    CaptHayfever

    CaptHayfever Awesome Smash Bros Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    36,742
    Location:
    (n) - the place where I am
    Today's electoral results:

    Trump officially lost 2, both from Texas; 1 switched to Kasich & 1 to Ron Paul.
    Clinton officially lost 4, all from Washington; 3 switched to Colin Powell & 1 to Faith Spotted Eagle.

    Several of the original electors, however (from both red & blue states), complained that they were replaced before they could vote.
    The 6 who got through, though, make the highest count of faithless electors since 1912 (which barely even counts, since those 8 only went faithless because the VP candidate on their ticket died & they picked a different VP for practical reasons).
    The next high count before that was 27 in 1896, again focused entirely on VP candidates.
    Before that were 63 in 1872, again because of a dead candidate.
    The 23 in 1836 again only switched on the VP vote.
    The last time a plural number of electors changed votes to protest a presidential candidate was in 1832, when 2 electors bailed on Henry Clay & 30 bailed on Martin Van Buren.

    And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
  6.  
    I am nobody

    I am nobody I am not mean spam Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    12,025
    Location:
    -89.97814998,-42.2333493
    ^Van Buren was Jackson's VP in that election, though. He ran for president in the next election, when all 23 of the ones you mentioned kept up the trend by going against his VP.

    I mean, my OP in this thread shows how many people weren't predicting this even six weeks ago, so I certainly don't disagree with you on that count.

    And I actually also agree that an effective opposition is necessary for good government, but you can't artificially create that by propping up a less popular party through weighting votes or (as both parties are shamelessly guilty of) gerrymandering. If the GOP truly is losing appeal so rapidly that a popular vote election would knock them out of competition for decades, then the Electoral College is the worst thing possible for them, because it's (a) only delaying the inevitable and (b) allowing them to avoid learning to be more popular while they still have the chance.
  7.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    The whole Trump has a 1% chance of winning nonsense was some combination of wishful thinking and fake news, though a year ago, he wasn't being considered a real threat either. Even beyond Trump, I wasn't expecting Hillary to outright dismiss 1/4th of the electorate, and the rise of socialism by that specific name in this country is a relatively new phenomenon that didn't have quite enough steam but may break out in the coming decade.

    The question if the GOP can't recapture the popular vote is where they lose control. Coal miners in Ohio or people in little but important now yet completely irrelevant in a popular vote New Hampshire aren't really concerned with what Californians think. If the GOP start to lose places like the southwest, that would be a cause for concern. Remaining competitive without Texas is a large undertaking no matter what the rest of the map looks like. The growing Hispanic population is the biggest challenge that does not have very much time left to be improved, and a wall may be a big gamble.
  8.  
    CaptHayfever

    CaptHayfever Awesome Smash Bros Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    36,742
    Location:
    (n) - the place where I am
    Also, attempting to make another country pay for said wall is an even bigger gamble.

    And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
  9.  
    Random User

    Random User Overlord of Evil

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,468
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    SECRET BASE INSIDE SNAKE MOUNTAIN
    The wall isn't going to do anything, realistically. Most illegal immigrants just overstay their work visas. All it'll accomplish is stepping on the toes of private landowners on the Rio Grande. Surely a good idea to win Texas votes is forcibly using Texan's land.

    I don't think Trump is going to build the wall. Maybe he'll start construction, but I don't see him attempting to actually complete such an expensive venture when the payout is virtually nothing.
    CaptHayfever likes this.
  10.  
    The Amazing Tazy Ten

    The Amazing Tazy Ten I'm tired. Goodnight. Zzzzzzzzz! Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2000
    Messages:
    28,585
    Location:
    In limbo playing Tactics A2 for eternity.
    Also, they're just gonna dig under it.
  11.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    Millions of people cross the border illegally. It's not the only way, but it's the easiest way. You can walk across the "river" dressed as Osama bin Laden and nobody will notice.

    I don't see a way around wall building given how high on the priority list he placed it. What specific form that may take is perhaps another story. Hungary built a fence and saw its daily illegal migrants drop from 4600 to 15.
  12.  
    Sim Kid

    Sim Kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    13,207
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The state of Denial
    That and planes can just fly over it and boats can go around it anyway.
  13.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    It's definitely not a perfect solution. It's probably not even half a solution. It's a start, both as a physical and psychological barrier. Of course, it may also serve as a physical reminder of the person/party that put it there, whatever that may mean.
  14.  
    Sim Kid

    Sim Kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    13,207
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The state of Denial
    Now I wonder what they intend to do about automation, too...
  15.  
    X-3

    X-3 _____<|0-0|>_____ Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    22,830
    Gender:
    Male
    Easy. They'll blame whatever economical/social/safety problems exist then on robots.
  16.  
    Sim Kid

    Sim Kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    13,207
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The state of Denial
    You sure they won't just find some way to blame those no-good-dirty-rotten-job-stealing-immigrants? (Who are somehow also too lazy to work at the same time... schrodinger's immigrants?)
  17.  
    Auron

    Auron Plague Butt

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2001
    Messages:
    7,616
    Location:
    Snowed in
    They'll obviously blame the Democrats. It's just politics. Neither side is ever wrong and it's always the other guys fault. Decreased regulations and increased tax cuts for the rich leads to increased deportation of jobs and increased automation? It's clearly lasting effects of Obamanomics. Give us four more years to fix it.
  18.  
    Shane

    Shane Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 1999
    Messages:
    141,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Upidtown
    There's an easy target for robots. $15/hour minimum wage. They're coming anyway, but this is basically just like saying if you're looking for trouble, we'll help you find it. Once they take over, socialism may well become the most viable form of government.
  19.  
    JOEBIALEK

    JOEBIALEK Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    36
    Location:
    CLEVELAND
    The debate has started again as to whether the US Constitution should be amended in order to change the presidential election process. Some promote
    eliminating the Electoral College in favor of a direct popular vote for president while others believe the Electoral College should remain unchanged. Just as compromise solved the initial problems of the framers so it is that compromise can solve this problem. The solution is to change the electoral votes to electoral points and reward each candidate a percentage of points based on the percentage of popular votes received in each state.
    This would eliminate the "winner take all" system thus allowing for all the votes to count. A voter is more apt to believe their vote counted when a percentage of popular votes are taken into account rather than the "all or nothing" system currently in existence. Further, this new system would integrate the desire for a popular vote for president with the need for the individual states to determine who actually gets elected.

    As for political primaries the number of delegates awarded in each state should be determined by the percentage of votes won by each candidate.

    For 2016 multiplying the percentage of votes each candidate received {in each state} times the number of electoral votes {in each state} results in the following: Clinton 256.985 and Trump 253.482.
  20.  
    I REALLY HATE POKEMON!

    I REALLY HATE POKEMON! Goku lives on the Sun

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2000
    Messages:
    27,498
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    California, U.S.A
    We should develop a better way of accurately testing intelligence and grant each vote a number of points based on that. Idiots shouldn't have so much sway in deciding our fate.

Share This Page