Star Wars Live-Action TV series - Page 2

**Valigarmander** · 09-22-2008, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chunky Kong12345

I've heard IV was better than Temple of Doom :V

For a second I thought you meant Star Wars IV, and I was about ready to beat your ass in with a rototiller.

Panfan · 09-22-2008, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wariovswario

What's your definition of Good? Calling something crap because YOU didn't like it is not fair. I don't see why anyone should have a negative opinion of this ESPECIALLY SINCE IT ISN'T EVEN OUT YET!!!!!!!!!

1. I can't call something I don't like crap? I thought that was, you know, part of not liking it, that you think it's crap. Thank you for clearing this up.

2. See: Pitcher post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonicus Prime

Well, if the "quality" you're talking about includes the Force Unleashed, Ep. III, The original Clone Wars, and the prequels in general, then I'm all for this.

Don't jump on the "oh the prequels suck" bandwagon. The only reason people liked the original trilogy better is because half the people that bitch were 6 when they first saw it.

I'm not saying they're bad for bandwagon purposes. III's definitely an 8/10, and II's somewhere between 6 and 7. I didn't like I at all though besides action sequences. The video games are awesome, I've gotta admit that. (Especially KOTOR, Battlefront II, Lego Star Wars, and Jedi Knight) And Clone Wars was an awesome series.

As with Gale, I'm mainly focusing on his latest efforts, such as Indy IV (which you cannot convince me is good. That's not nostalgic either. I didn't like Temple of Doom at all either) and 3D Clone Wars

But yeah, there is some nostalgic factor for the original trilogy. Though III's about the same as VI in my book.

Rainbow Dash · 09-22-2008, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winston Payne

For a second I thought you meant Star Wars IV, and I was about ready to beat your ass in with a rototiller.

I'm confused as to why that confusion would warrant a rototiller ass-beating.

**Valigarmander** · 09-22-2008, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chunky Kong12345

I'm confused as to why that confusion would warrant a rototiller ass-beating.

I didn't like Temple of Doom too much. Nowhere as good as Raiders. And thinking I heard you compare it to the original Star Wars and bring it the victor sent me into a movie nerd's rage.

Rainbow Dash · 09-22-2008, 08:30 PM

Hmm. You took that differently than how I intended that to be heard. Wasn't being sarcastic.

Irregardless,

**Valigarmander** · 09-22-2008, 08:57 PM

...I'm confused.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Erdawn Il Deus · 09-24-2008, 03:58 PM

There may be some nostalgia factor in liking the original trilogy but to suggest that the 'prequels' are of higher cinematic quality is ridiculous.

Kargath · 09-25-2008, 05:28 AM

Han Solo is the entire reason for the Original Trilogy's success.

Demonicus Prime · 09-25-2008, 07:43 AM

Because I mean, the storyline layed out by the Vader-Luke relationship or the eventual overthrow of the Emperor, or any other part of the story had nothing to do with it.

And like I said, the only reason people think 4-6 are better is because of nostalgia.

1-up Salesman · 09-26-2008, 11:29 PM

It could be good if done with episodes like this

1. An episode about Boba Fett becoming a Bounty Hunter, and for him to be a major character.

2. Alot of episodes about Darth Vader, just being awesome.

3. A 4-part story about Galen Marek/ Starkiller/ The Apprentice being trained.

**Galefore** · 09-26-2008, 11:50 PM

^To the first, yes, Boba's story could be further explored, but if I'm not mistaken there has been a lot of Expanded Universe material doing just that. An episode/arc would be interesting, though. As to Vader, they're sure to use him a ****load, and to the third, eh, nah, Starkiller is pretty adequately explored in Force Unleashed. It'd be kind of overkill to squeeze the character dry.

Joker · 10-06-2008, 03:46 PM

Jedi Master Quinlan-Vos !!!! That's all this live action show needs.

***Booyakasha*** · 10-19-2008, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonicus Prime

And like I said, the only reason people think 4-6 are better is because of nostalgia.

Yeah. Not buying that one at all.

Rainbow Dash · 10-21-2008, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Booyakasha

Yeah. Not buying that one at all.

are you implying that the prequels were sub-par, good sir

because that is something i have never heard in my days on this earth

***Booyakasha*** · 10-21-2008, 10:38 PM

That the prequels are lousy is old news.

This 'anyone who thinks the prequels are lousy is just looking at the past through the rosy-tinted glasses of halcyon days gone by' line of crap is new news.

Rainbow Dash · 10-22-2008, 03:12 PM

what didn't you like about the prequels (that isn't the romance or jar-jar)

**Valigarmander** · 10-22-2008, 08:03 PM

^ Portman and Christensen's acting?

Rainbow Dash · 10-22-2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chunky Kong12345

(that isn't the romance)

**Valigarmander** · 10-22-2008, 09:08 PM

I meant, their acting in general, not necessarily between each other.

Rainbow Dash · 10-22-2008, 09:11 PM

I dunno, he plays a good angsty, guilt-ridden teen/young adult.

09-22-2008, 08:57 PM	#26
Valigarmander The Bee's Knees Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The land of rain and trees (Oregon) Gender: Posts: 29,222 Thanks: 1,611 Thanked 5,553 Times in 2,499 Posts Blog Entries: 18	...I'm confused. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA __________________

10-22-2008, 08:03 PM	#37
Valigarmander The Bee's Knees Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The land of rain and trees (Oregon) Gender: Posts: 29,222 Thanks: 1,611 Thanked 5,553 Times in 2,499 Posts Blog Entries: 18	^ Portman and Christensen's acting? __________________

10-22-2008, 09:08 PM	#39
Valigarmander The Bee's Knees Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The land of rain and trees (Oregon) Gender: Posts: 29,222 Thanks: 1,611 Thanked 5,553 Times in 2,499 Posts Blog Entries: 18	I meant, their acting in general, not necessarily between each other. __________________

09-22-2008, 08:30 PM	#25
Rainbow Dash been dreamin', i've been waitin' Join Date: Jan 2001 Gender: Posts: 23,788 Thanks: 168 Thanked 1,120 Times in 677 Posts	Hmm. You took that differently than how I intended that to be heard. Wasn't being sarcastic. Irregardless,

09-24-2008, 03:58 PM	#27
Erdawn Il Deus Senior Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Threading the jeweled thrones of earth under my sandalled feet Gender: Posts: 3,056 Thanks: 4 Thanked 47 Times in 41 Posts	There may be some nostalgia factor in liking the original trilogy but to suggest that the 'prequels' are of higher cinematic quality is ridiculous.

09-25-2008, 05:28 AM	#28
Kargath Awesome member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: kargath64.deviantart.com Gender: Posts: 8,061 Thanks: 1,187 Thanked 729 Times in 458 Posts Blog Entries: 1	Han Solo is the entire reason for the Original Trilogy's success.

09-25-2008, 07:43 AM	#29
Demonicus Prime Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I Pity The Fool Who Confuses Me With Someone Other Than YoshiFreak. Gender: Posts: 3,108 Thanks: 648 Thanked 129 Times in 87 Posts	Because I mean, the storyline layed out by the Vader-Luke relationship or the eventual overthrow of the Emperor, or any other part of the story had nothing to do with it. And like I said, the only reason people think 4-6 are better is because of nostalgia.

09-26-2008, 11:29 PM	#30
1-up Salesman Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Your bedroom. I love it here! Gender: Posts: 3,861 Thanks: 2,071 Thanked 228 Times in 180 Posts Blog Entries: 9	It could be good if done with episodes like this 1. An episode about Boba Fett becoming a Bounty Hunter, and for him to be a major character. 2. Alot of episodes about Darth Vader, just being awesome. 3. A 4-part story about Galen Marek/ Starkiller/ The Apprentice being trained.

09-26-2008, 11:50 PM	#31
Galefore EXPLOSION GOD OF MUSIC Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Some studio somewhere Gender: Posts: 8,255 Thanks: 1,357 Thanked 823 Times in 532 Posts Blog Entries: 5	^To the first, yes, Boba's story could be further explored, but if I'm not mistaken there has been a lot of Expanded Universe material doing just that. An episode/arc would be interesting, though. As to Vader, they're sure to use him a ****load, and to the third, eh, nah, Starkiller is pretty adequately explored in Force Unleashed. It'd be kind of overkill to squeeze the character dry.

10-06-2008, 03:46 PM	#32
Joker Lord of Vampires / God of Vengeance Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: The Planet of Eternal Darkness Gender: Posts: 11,117 Thanks: 3,273 Thanked 580 Times in 364 Posts Blog Entries: 6	Jedi Master Quinlan-Vos !!!! That's all this live action show needs.

10-21-2008, 10:38 PM	#35
*Booyakasha* SuperMod of War Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Wisconsinland Gender: Posts: 9,655 Thanks: 153 Thanked 1,386 Times in 704 Posts	That the prequels are lousy is old news. This 'anyone who thinks the prequels are lousy is just looking at the past through the rosy-tinted glasses of halcyon days gone by' line of crap is new news.

10-22-2008, 03:12 PM	#36
Rainbow Dash been dreamin', i've been waitin' Join Date: Jan 2001 Gender: Posts: 23,788 Thanks: 168 Thanked 1,120 Times in 677 Posts	what didn't you like about the prequels (that isn't the romance or jar-jar)

10-22-2008, 09:11 PM	#40
Rainbow Dash been dreamin', i've been waitin' Join Date: Jan 2001 Gender: Posts: 23,788 Thanks: 168 Thanked 1,120 Times in 677 Posts	I dunno, he plays a good angsty, guilt-ridden teen/young adult.