|
| Welcome to the Video Game Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Cheat Codes | Arcade-(279 Games) | RPG | Donate | Member Forums | Daily Crossword Puzzle |
| View Poll Results: Who would win | |||
| Mike Tyson | | 8 | 72.73% |
| Muhammad Ali | | 3 | 27.27% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | Withdraw Vote | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| You just freaking blew Joe Biden's mind! Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: WHAT?house Gender: Posts: 19,491 Thanks: 513 Thanked 1,449 Times in 849 Posts Blog Entries: 5 | Who would win between these two... Imagine both Mike Tyson and Muhammad Ali in their primes. Someone invented a time machine and got them two to fight. Who would win? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 1999 Gender: Posts: 3,003 Thanks: 43 Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts | As good as Ali was, I think Tyson in his prime was unbeatable. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Guest Posts: n/a | I would have to go with ali. |
|
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Your Pants Gender: Posts: 3,685 Thanks: 184 Thanked 165 Times in 91 Posts | I know nothing about boxing. I voted Tyson, simply because I love his voice. ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: The tallest tree in the forest. Gender: Posts: 1,004 Thanks: 13 Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts | I'd go with Mike Tyson. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Palmdale, California Posts: 3,228 Thanks: 1 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts | Ali definately. He handled Foreman, he can handle Tyson. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I'll take Street Fighter over Dragonball any day. Gender: Posts: 2,549 Thanks: 0 Thanked 191 Times in 126 Posts | they both fight to the death, and they end up.... KOing each other. i dont care if this is not a choice |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 1999 Gender: Posts: 3,003 Thanks: 43 Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts | Ali had a much better career as a whole and was by far the more consistent of the two, hence him being the "Greatest of all Time." But when Tyson was in his prime, he absolutely could not be stopped. Period. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Fly like a butterfly, Sting like bee. |
|
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: DenCo Gender: Posts: 9,850 Thanks: 127 Thanked 365 Times in 192 Posts | Ali. Hands down. If you said Tyson, you need to go watch ESPN Classics and watch some of Ali's best fights because you have no concept of what it was like in a heavyweight division with top class talent. Ali kicked ass through his entire career, even though he missed his prime years for refusing to fight in Vietnam. The only way Tyson would have a chance is if he could get a quick knockout. Ali has the height and reach on him (Tyson typically struggles against bigger opponents because they can keep him at a distance) , and Ali proved time after time that he could go the distance with heavy hitters (fraiser, foreman, etc). This doesn't even get into the head games Ali would pull on Tyson. Tyson fought at the decline of the heavyweight division and boxing in general, and as a result didn't get the competition. He fought chumps. Last edited by Lurch1982; 12-23-2006 at 05:57 PM. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Lurch1982 For This Useful Post: |
| | #12 |
| Guest Posts: n/a | That was so true! |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |